<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Future of Insight &#187; Quirk&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureofinsight.com/category/quirks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com</link>
	<description>Future of Insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 03:17:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>RESPECT Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2009/12/respect-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2009/12/respect-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quirk's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofinsight.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the finest summary of the challenge the industry has in regards to its gravitas is Greg Rathjen&#8217;s piece in the December 2008 edition of Quirk&#8217;s.
Here, Rathjen asks, &#8220;When do we stop identifying with Rodney Dangerfield?&#8221;
It is well worth a read here. 
Key quote:
&#8220;I suppose what I am building up to is my own reverse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the finest summary of the challenge the industry has in regards to its gravitas is Greg Rathjen&#8217;s piece in the December 2008 edition of Quirk&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Here, Rathjen asks, &#8220;When do we stop identifying with Rodney Dangerfield?&#8221;</p>
<p>It is well worth a read <a href="https://www.quirks.com/articles/2008/20081208.aspx?searchID=22136235&#038;sort=5&#038;pg=1&#038;msg=3">here</a>. </p>
<p>Key quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I suppose what I am building up to is my own reverse polemic: that it is time to stop being Rodney Dangerfield, time to stop being the downtrodden, overworked partner and insist that both parties respect one another and deliver a more mutually-satisfying process of collecting, disseminating and using information. Marketing research has to be “at the table” not hoping to be; marketing research needs to be on the first string; marketing research needs to be more than the “little woman” who keeps the house clean and the beds made.&#8221;</p>
<p>The piece is a response to Kieron Mathews&#8217; equally cutting piece titled “Going beyond the numbers”, in which Mathews chides the industry for not doing more to build its value and gravitas. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2009/12/respect-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
