<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MR in 2020</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureofinsight.com/2010/04/mr-in-2020/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2010/04/mr-in-2020/</link>
	<description>Future of Insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2010/04/mr-in-2020/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofinsight.com/?p=233#comment-284</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by mlmamo: Interesting thoughts to ponder on the future of the #MR industry - MR in 2020 #http://bit.ly/dtmxpZ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by mlmamo: Interesting thoughts to ponder on the future of the #MR industry &#8211; MR in 2020 #http://bit.ly/dtmxpZ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2010/04/mr-in-2020/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofinsight.com/?p=233#comment-269</guid>
		<description>HI, Thanks for the reference, and glad my post interested. Your points are well taken, and I agree the industry could look very different in 10 years. But a couple of points:

- Since this post I&#039;ve had a LOT of emails about &quot;data,  sub-contractors taking over&quot; (it&#039;s interesting how threatened some MR people are by such an idea!) but the core scenario in my post was about how various kinds of unlikely firms who currently supply information to MR agencies and clients could expand - this could well include consultancy firms as you mention, but also software/DB and other information amalgamation orientated outfits. Your point about Google et al is important in this regard.
- I think some neuroscience and social media agencies may well expand rapidly in the next few years and some of their owners will do very well indeed - but the most successful will be bought out by traditional agencies and the emerging types of new players.
- My guess is that the changes happening will make the underlying RESEARCH skill sets of MR still highly relevant: analytical skills, information synthesis, data-based consulting etc. So while the methods may change, and MR people may work in lot of different places (not just agencies and research departments), I think there will still be lots of people who will be pleased to class themselves as &quot;market researchers&quot;.

Anyway, it will be an interesting decade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI, Thanks for the reference, and glad my post interested. Your points are well taken, and I agree the industry could look very different in 10 years. But a couple of points:</p>
<p>- Since this post I&#8217;ve had a LOT of emails about &#8220;data,  sub-contractors taking over&#8221; (it&#8217;s interesting how threatened some MR people are by such an idea!) but the core scenario in my post was about how various kinds of unlikely firms who currently supply information to MR agencies and clients could expand &#8211; this could well include consultancy firms as you mention, but also software/DB and other information amalgamation orientated outfits. Your point about Google et al is important in this regard.<br />
- I think some neuroscience and social media agencies may well expand rapidly in the next few years and some of their owners will do very well indeed &#8211; but the most successful will be bought out by traditional agencies and the emerging types of new players.<br />
- My guess is that the changes happening will make the underlying RESEARCH skill sets of MR still highly relevant: analytical skills, information synthesis, data-based consulting etc. So while the methods may change, and MR people may work in lot of different places (not just agencies and research departments), I think there will still be lots of people who will be pleased to class themselves as &#8220;market researchers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, it will be an interesting decade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention MR in 2020 &#124; Future of Insight -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofinsight.com/2010/04/mr-in-2020/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention MR in 2020 &#124; Future of Insight -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofinsight.com/?p=233#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bernie Malinoff, Allison V Quigley. Allison V Quigley said: The Future of Insight Blog: Market Research in 2020 (thoughts on which players will dominate the #MR industry) http://bit.ly/dtmxpZ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bernie Malinoff, Allison V Quigley. Allison V Quigley said: The Future of Insight Blog: Market Research in 2020 (thoughts on which players will dominate the #MR industry) <a href="http://bit.ly/dtmxpZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dtmxpZ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

